The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Star-formation rates, molecular clouds, and the origin of the far-infrared luminosity of isolated and interacting galaxies
Abstract
The CO luminosities of 93 galaxies have been determined and compared with their IRAS far-infrared (FIR) luminosities. The galaxies have been classified into five types according to the degree of interaction, and the FIR to CO luminosity ratios have been determined as a function of interaction type. Strongly interacting/merging galaxies have L_FIR_/L_CO_ substantially higher than that of isolated galaxies, weakly interacting galaxies, or giant molecular clouds (GMCs); in particular galaxies with tidal tails/bridges are found to have L_FIR_/L_CO_ 9 times that of isolated galaxies. This effect is due to high FIR luminosities rather than low CO luminosities. Isolated and weakly interacting galaxies have L_FIR_/L_CO_ close to that of galactic GMCs. There is almost no difference between isolated galaxies and galaxies with companions unless there are morphological signs of a collision. The FIR luminosities of isolated and weakly interacting galaxies can be understood as a result of star formation similar to that in galactic GMCs. We conclude that if the high ratio L_FIR_/L_CO_ in strongly interacting/merging galaxies is due to star formation, then the rate of star formation per unit mass is higher than that of any galactic GMC, i.e., star formation is different and much more efficient than in any galactic cloud. The molecular gas depletion time in these systems is only 3 x 10^8^ yr. The CO luminosities and molecular masses of the FIR luminous interacting galaxies are among the highest observed for any spiral galaxies. They are gas-rich systems with about 10^10^ M_sun_ of molecular hydrogen and a high star-formation rate per unit mass.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
STAR FORMATION IN GALAXIES ALONG THE HUBBLE SEQUENCE
Kennicutt, R. C. (1998) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 · Cited by 6,578
Star Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902
“A similar non-linear dependence is observed for total SFR (as opposed to SFR surface density) versus total molecular gas mass (e.g., Solomon & Sage 1988; Gao & Solomon 2004), and presumably is another manifestation of the same underlying physical correlation.”
BackgroundThe Molecular Interstellar Medium in Ultraluminous Infrared Galaxies
Solomon, P. M., Downes, D., Radford, S. J. E., & Barrett, J. W. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/303765 · Cited by 910
Self-citationMolecular Gas at High Redshift
Solomon, P. M., & Vanden Bout, P. A. (2005) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.43.051804.102221 · Cited by 868
Self-citationDusty star-forming galaxies at high redshift
Casey, C. M., Narayanan, D., & Cooray, A. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.009 · Cited by 800
Metadata
- Authors
- Solomon, P. M., & Sage, L. J.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1988-11
- Volume
- 334
- Pages
- 613
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2083027379
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Star-formation rates, molecular clouds, and the origin of the far-infrared luminosity of isolated and interacting galaxies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/166865
- The paper
- Solomon, P. M., & Sage, L. J. (1988). Star-formation rates, molecular clouds, and the origin of the far-infrared luminosity of isolated and interacting galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/166865
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
