Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 772

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fast algorithm for spectral analysis of unevenly sampled data

Press, William H., Rybicki, George B.·1989·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The Lomb-Scargle method performs spectral analysis on unevenly sampled data and is known to be a powerful way to find, and test the significance of, weak periodic signals. The method has previously been thought to be 'slow', requiring of order 10(2)N(2) operations to analyze N data points. We show that Fast Fourier Transforms (FFTs) can be used in a novel way to make the computation of order 10(2)N log N. Despite its use of the FFT, the algorithm is in no way equivalent to conventional FFT periodogram analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/167197

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 772

Metadata

Authors
Press, W. H., & Rybicki, G. B.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1989-03
Volume
338
Pages
277
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2008150142
Cited by
772
References
0
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fast algorithm for spectral analysis of unevenly sampled data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/167197
The paper
Press, W. H., & Rybicki, G. B. (1989). Fast algorithm for spectral analysis of unevenly sampled data. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/167197

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.