The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Extragalactic globular clusters. III - Metallicity comparisons and anomalies
Abstract
Using a method based on the strengths of six absorption line indices measured in integrated spectra, we have derived metallicities for 22 globular clusters associated with the Sc galaxy, M33, 10 globular clusters associated with the giant elliptical galaxy, M87, eight globular clusters associated with the Sb(r)I-II galaxy, M81, and three globular clusters associated with the Fornax dwarf elliptical galaxy. In addition, we have derived mean metallicities for 38 bright galaxies, mostly ellipticals, 29 dwarf elliptical galaxies in the Virgo cluster, 10 dwarf elliptical galaxies in the Fornax cluster and four local group dwarf galaxies. Comparing these results with metallicities we previously derived for 149 clusters in M31 and with the Milky Way cluster metallicities, we show that the mean metallicity of a cluster system is linearly related to the luminosity of the parent galaxy. A similar relationship is suggested between galaxy metallicity and luminosity for the bright and dwarf galaxies, although metallicity is not the only parameter differentiating the spectroscopic properties of galaxies. The slope of the relationshIp between the mean metallicity of a cluster system and parent galaxy luminosity is very similar to the slope of the relationship between galaxy metallicity and luminosity, but there is an offset in the sense that the clusters are more metal poor. Investigation of the distribution of 12 different line strength indices versus metallicity for clusters and galaxies shows a remarkable uniformity in abundance characteristics among these diverse populations. The only apparent abundance anomalies are in the strengths of cyanogen (4170 A) and the Ca II H and K lines, both of which are enhanced in M31 globular clusters
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tremonti, C. A., Heckman, T. M., Kauffmann, G., Brinchmann, J., Charlot, S., White, S. D. M., Seibert, M., Peng, E. W., Schlegel, D. J., Uomoto, A., et al. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/423264 · Cited by 3,608
Ferguson, H. C., & Binggeli, B. (1994) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/bf01208252 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Brodie, J. P., & Huchra, J. P.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1991-09
- Volume
- 379
- Pages
- 157
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1982945915
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extragalactic globular clusters. III - Metallicity comparisons and anomalies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/170492
- The paper
- Brodie, J. P., & Huchra, J. P. (1991). Extragalactic globular clusters. III - Metallicity comparisons and anomalies. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/170492
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.