Cited by 1,253Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

Evolution of low- and intermediate-mass stars to the end of the asymptotic giant branch with mass loss

Vassiliadis, E., Wood, P. R.·1993·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The results of stellar evolution calculations from the main sequence through to the end of the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) phase with mass loss are presented. It is shown that typical low mass AGB stars naturally suffer one or more superwind phases of mass loss toward the end of the AGB. These superwinds occur during the latter parts of the quiescent phases of helium shell flash cycles. The mass loss rates produced by the superwinds are similar to those required for PN production, and the occurrence of multiple superwind phases can account for the existence of AGB stars with hollow shells and multiple shell PNs. Each superwind phase leads to the loss of a few tenths of a solar mass. The mass loss rate used are based on empirical determinations for AGB stars; comparisons of model predictions with observations suggest that these rates can be used to model AGB evolution realistically.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/173033

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mass-loss rates of AGB stars are very uncertain and difficult to determine from observations without a priori assumptions about dust mass and type, and/or radiative transfer modelling.

    “This is because the mass-loss rates of AGB stars are very uncertain and difficult to determine from observations without a priori assumptions about dust mass and type, and/or radiative transfer modelling (e.g., Bedijn 1988; Vassiliadis & Wood 1993; Habing 1996; van Loon et al. 1999a; Groenewegen et al. 2009a, 2009b; Lagadec & Zijlstra 2008;”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vassiliadis, E., & Wood, P. R.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1993-08
Volume
413
Pages
641
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2087069688
Cited by
1,253
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 48
FWCI
16.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
asymptotic giant branch, stellar mass loss, superwind, helium shell flash, low-mass stars, intermediate-mass stars, planetary nebulae, hollow shells, stellar evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review