Evolution of low- and intermediate-mass stars to the end of the asymptotic giant branch with mass loss
Abstract
The results of stellar evolution calculations from the main sequence through to the end of the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) phase with mass loss are presented. It is shown that typical low mass AGB stars naturally suffer one or more superwind phases of mass loss toward the end of the AGB. These superwinds occur during the latter parts of the quiescent phases of helium shell flash cycles. The mass loss rates produced by the superwinds are similar to those required for PN production, and the occurrence of multiple superwind phases can account for the existence of AGB stars with hollow shells and multiple shell PNs. Each superwind phase leads to the loss of a few tenths of a solar mass. The mass loss rate used are based on empirical determinations for AGB stars; comparisons of model predictions with observations suggest that these rates can be used to model AGB evolution realistically.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The mass-loss rates of AGB stars are very uncertain and difficult to determine from observations without a priori assumptions about dust mass and type, and/or radiative transfer modelling.
“This is because the mass-loss rates of AGB stars are very uncertain and difficult to determine from observations without a priori assumptions about dust mass and type, and/or radiative transfer modelling (e.g., Bedijn 1988; Vassiliadis & Wood 1993; Habing 1996; van Loon et al. 1999a; Groenewegen et al. 2009a, 2009b; Lagadec & Zijlstra 2008;”
From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Vassiliadis & Wood 1993
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars
Karakas, A. I., & Lattanzio, J. C. (2014) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2014.21 · Cited by 735 · see citing works
“The most widely used prescriptions in AGB evolutionary calculations include the Vassiliadis & Wood (1993) mass-loss law, based on empirical observations of mass-loss rates in C and O-rich AGB stars in the Galaxy and Magellanic Clouds; the Blöcker (1995) formula, based on dynamical calculations of…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialC and N Abundances in Stars at the Base of the Red Giant Branch in M15
Cohen, J. G., Briley, M. M., & Stetson, P. B. (2005) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/431974 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
On variations in the fine-structure constant and stellar pollution of quasar absorption systems
Fenner, Y., Murphy, M. T., & Gibson, B. K. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08781.x · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vassiliadis, E., & Wood, P. R.
- ORCID
- Wood, P. R.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1993-08
- Volume
- 413
- Pages
- 641
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2087069688
- Cited by
- 1,253
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 48
- FWCI
- 16.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Keywords
- asymptotic giant branch, stellar mass loss, superwind, helium shell flash, low-mass stars, intermediate-mass stars, planetary nebulae, hollow shells, stellar evolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review