The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Second-order power spectrum and nonlinear evolution at high redshift
Open accessAbstract
The Eulerian cosmological fluid equations are used to study the nonlinear mode coupling of density fluctuations. We evaluate the second-order power spectrum including all four-point contributions. In the weakly nonlinear regime we find that the dominant nonlinear contribution for realistic cosmological spectra is made by the coupling of long-wave modes and is well estimated by second order perturbation theory. For a linear spectrum like that of the cold dark matter model, second order effects cause a significant enhancement of the high $k$ part of the spectrum and a slight suppression at low $k$ near the peak of the spectrum. Our perturbative results agree well in the quasilinear regime with the nonlinear spectrum from high-resolution N-body simulations. We find that due to the long-wave mode coupling, characteristic nonlinear masses grow less slowly in time (i.e., are larger at higher redshifts) than would be estimated using the linear power spectrum. For the cold dark matter model at $(1+z)=(20,10,5,2)$ the nonlinear mass is about $(180,8,2.5,1.6)$ times (respectively) larger than a linear extrapolation would indicate, if the condition rms $\delta\rho/\rho =1$ is used to define the nonlinear scale. At high redshift the Press-Schechter mass distribution significantly underestimates the abundance of high-mass objects for the cold dark matter model. Although the quantitative results depend on the definition of the nonlinear scale, these basic consequences hold for any initial spectrum whose post-recombination spectral index $n$ decreases sufficiently rapidly with increasing $k$, a feature which arises quite generally during the transition from a radiation- to matter-dominated universe.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Eisenstein, D. J., Zehavi, I., Hogg, D. W., Scoccimarro, R., Blanton, M. R., Nichol, R. C., Scranton, R., Seo, H., Tegmark, M., Zheng, Z., et al. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/466512 · Cited by 4,629
Statistical Properties of X‐Ray Clusters: Analytic and Numerical Comparisons
Bryan, G. L., & Norman, M. L. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305262 · Cited by 2,295
The density and peculiar velocity fields of nearby galaxies
Strauss, M. A., & Willick, J. A. (1995) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(95)00013-7 · Cited by 567
On the Robustness of the Acoustic Scale in the Low‐Redshift Clustering of Matter
Eisenstein, D. J., Seo, H., & White, M. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/518755 · Cited by 455
Eisenstein, D. J., Hu, W., & Tegmark, M. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307261 · Cited by 338
Metadata
- Authors
- Jain, B., & Bertschinger, E.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1994-08
- Volume
- 431
- Pages
- 495
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2049497678
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Second-order power spectrum and nonlinear evolution at high redshift. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/174502
- The paper
- Jain, B., & Bertschinger, E. (1994). Second-order power spectrum and nonlinear evolution at high redshift. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/174502
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.