Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Lithium Dip in M67: Comparison with the Hyades, Praesepe, and NGC 752 Clusters

Balachandran, Suchitra·1995·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Lithium abundances were measured in 17 subgiants and giants which have evolved from the main-sequence Li dip in the old open cluster M67. The absence of detectable Li in all but one subgiant argues strongly that Li is severely destroyed, not merely diffused from observable view, in the main-sequence stars. A comparison with the Hyades, Praesepe NGC 752, and M67 clusters is performed, requiring the adoption of a uniform temperature calibration, the use of newly standardized photometry for NGC 752, and the rederivation of Li abundances from published equivalent widths. Limitations of the commonly used temperature calibrations, and our adopted choice of the Saxner & Hammarbäck (1985) calibration, are discussed. Adoption of this calibration results in a significant change in the shape of the Hyades dip. A comparison of the Li dips in the various clusters reveals intriguing details. The mass at the Li dip depends upon the metallicity of the stars, but the zero-age main-sequence (ZAMS) temperatures of the dip stars are found to be independent of their metallicity. The morphology of the Li dip is characterized by a sharp drop at the blue edge and a more gradual rise at the red edge. There is no change in the ZAMS temperature or shape of the blue edge with age. The red edge becomes less steep with age; this may either be due to the evolution of the Li dip, or be caused by a decrease in Li in stars cooler than the red edge and thus unrelated to the Li dip phenomenon. The Li versus effective temperature distributions in the Hyades and Praesepe clusters, which are of the same age but different metallicity, are found to be identical in both the F and G dwarfs. None of the models so far proposed adequately explains the data. Microscopic diffusion and mass loss are contradicted by the observations of the Li dip. Models which incorporate rotation produce the Li dip through meridional circulation, turbulence, or rotational braking. Meridional circulation is in conflict with observations of Li outside the Li dip. All of the rotation models would produce a larger scatter in the Li dip than is observed. Observations suggest that the stars in the Li dip may undergo spin-down on a much longer timescale than late-F and G dwarfs. Examination of the rotational velocity distribution in dip stars in a cluster older than the Hyades may provide a clue to the anomalous mixing and Li depletion in the dip stars.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/175779

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Balachandran, S.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1995-06
Volume
446
Pages
203
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2069988667
Cited by
175
References
0
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.