The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A New Model for Black Hole Soft X-Ray Transients in Quiescence
Open accessAbstract
We present models of the soft X-ray transients, A0620-00, V404 Cyg, and X-ray Nova Mus 1991, in quiescence. In each source, we postulate that there is an outer region, extending outward from about 3000 Schwarzschild radii, where the accretion flow is in the form of a standard thin disk. The outer disk produces most of the radiation we observe in the infrared, optical, and UV bands. We propose that the disk undergoes an instability at its inner edge, perhaps by the mechanism described recently by Meyer & Meyer-Hofmeister (1994) for cataclysmic variables. The accreting gas is thereby converted into a hot corona which flows into the black hole as a nearly virial two-temperature flow. We describe the hot inner flow by means of a recently discovered stable solution of optically thin advection-dominated accretion. In this flow, most of the thermal energy released by viscous dissipation is advected into the black hole and only a small fraction, ∼10-4-10-3, of the energy is radiated. The radiation is in the form of Comptonized synchrotron and bremsstrahlung emission and has a broad spectrum extending from optical to soft gamma-rays. The models we present are consistent with all the available data in the three sources. In particular, the X-ray emission from the hot inner flow fits the observed flux and spectral index of A0620-00. We derive a mass accretion rate of 10-11 Msun yr-1 in A0620-00 and Nova Mus, and ∼few times 10-10 Msun yr-1 in V404 Cyg. The best fit to the data is obtained for a viscosity parameter α ∼ 0.1-0.3 in the hot flow. The models predict that all three sources must have substantial flux in hard X-rays and soft γ-rays. This prediction is testable in the case of V404 Cyg with current instruments. A necessary feature of our proposal is that most of the viscous energy released in the accretion is advected into the black hole without being radiated. The success of the models in fitting the observations therefore indicates that the accreting stars have event horizons and therefore confirms the black hole nature of these stars.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hot Accretion Flows Around Black Holes
Yuan, F., & Narayan, R. (2014) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141003 · Cited by 1,529
Self-citationEsin, A. A., McClintock, J. E., & Narayan, R. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304829 · Cited by 1,313
Self-citationThe Properties of X‐Ray and Optical Light Curves of X‐Ray Novae
Chen, W., Shrader, C. R., & Livio, M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304921 · Cited by 531
Advection-dominated accretion and the black hole event horizon
Narayan, R., & McClintock, J. E. (2008) · New Astronomy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2008.03.002 · Cited by 451
Self-citationNarayan, R., Mahadevan, R., Grindlay, J. E., Popham, R. G., & Gammie, C. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305070 · Cited by 428
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Narayan, R., McClintock, J. E., & Yi, I.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 457
- Pages
- 821
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2075884647
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Model for Black Hole Soft X-Ray Transients in Quiescence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/176777
- The paper
- Narayan, R., McClintock, J. E., & Yi, I. (1996). A New Model for Black Hole Soft X-Ray Transients in Quiescence. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/176777
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.