The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Is the Accretion Flow in NGC 4258 Advection Dominated?
Open accessAbstract
The mass of the central black hole in the active galaxy NGC 4258 (M106) has been measured to be M = 3.6 x 10^7^ M_sun_ by Miyoshi et al. The Eddington luminosity corresponding to this mass is L_E_ = 4.5 x 10^45^ ergs s^-1^. By contrast, the X-ray luminosity of the nucleus of NGC 4258 between 2 and 10 keV is (4 +/- 1) x 10^40^ ergs s^-1^ while the optical/UV luminosity is less than 1.5 x 10^42^ ergs s^-1^. The luminosity of NGC 4258 is therefore extremely sub-Eddington: L ~ 10^-5^ L_E_ in X-rays and L ~ 3 x 10^-4^ LE even if we take the maximum optical/UV luminosity. Assuming the usual accretion efficiency of 0.1 would imply accretion rates orders of magnitude lower than in Seyfert galaxies and quasars. We show that the properties of the active galactic nuclei (AGNs) in NGC 4258 can be explained by an accretion flow in the form of a very hot, optically thin plasma that advects most of the viscously generated thermal energy into the central black hole and radiates only a small fraction of the energy. In this case, the accretion rate in Eddington units could be as high as ~0.16α, where α is the standard viscosity parameter; and the size of the hot disk should be larger than ~10 times the Schwarzschild radius. We compare the predictions of this model with observations and discuss its application to other low-luminosity AGNs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hot Accretion Flows Around Black Holes
Yuan, F., & Narayan, R. (2014) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141003 · Cited by 1,529
Self-citationEsin, A. A., McClintock, J. E., & Narayan, R. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304829 · Cited by 1,313
Self-citationNonlinear Outcome of Gravitational Instability in Cooling, Gaseous Disks
Gammie, C. F. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/320631 · Cited by 1,012
Advection-dominated accretion and the black hole event horizon
Narayan, R., & McClintock, J. E. (2008) · New Astronomy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2008.03.002 · Cited by 451
Self-citationNarayan, R., Mahadevan, R., Grindlay, J. E., Popham, R. G., & Gammie, C. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305070 · Cited by 428
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lasota, J.-P., Abramowicz, M. A., Chen, X., Krolik, J., Narayan, R., & Yi, I.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 462
- Pages
- 142
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2084472499
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is the Accretion Flow in NGC 4258 Advection Dominated? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/177137
- The paper
- Lasota, J.-P., Abramowicz, M. A., Chen, X., Krolik, J., Narayan, R., & Yi, I. (1996). Is the Accretion Flow in NGC 4258 Advection Dominated? The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/177137
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.