Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 833

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Are gamma-ray bursts optically thick?

Goodman, J.·1986·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that optically thick neutron-star models can produce very hard spectra if the energy density of the source is as high as it is in a thermal radiation field at a temperature of about 1 MeV, consideration is given to the fate of a quantity E of pure energy. This quantity is initially confined to a sphere in equilibrium at a temperature greater than 1 MeV and then allowed to expand freely. Given the shortcomings of conventional models, the possibility that burst sources could be optically thick and distant should not be dismissed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/184741

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 833

Metadata

Authors
Goodman, J.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1986-09
Volume
308
Pages
L47
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1968854473
Cited by
833
References
0
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are gamma-ray bursts optically thick? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/184741
The paper
Goodman, J. (1986). Are gamma-ray bursts optically thick? The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/184741

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.