Cited by 69Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Breakdown of the core mass-luminosity relation at high luminosities on the asymptotic giant branch

Boothroyd, Arnold I., Sackmann, I.-J.·1992·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Hot bottom burning in asymptotic giant branch stars causes a breakdown of the core mass-luminosity (MC-L) relation. For stellar models with up-to-date input physics, including molecular opacities and the associated higher mixing length, the breakdown takes place at core masses greater than or approximately equal to 0.85 solar luminosity, i.e., luminosities brighter than Mbol of about -6. This occurs in stars of initial mass greater than or approximately equal to 5 solar luminosities for Population I (Z = 0.02) compositions, and greater than or approximately equal to 4 solar luminosities for Population II (Z = 0.001). For these stars, the luminosity increases much more steeply than the MC-L relation would predict, and is no longer independent of the stellar mass. Large mass loss rates can turn off hot bottom burning by significantly reducing the star's mass (and thus the temperature at the base of the convective envelope), causing the star's luminosity to decline toward the standard MC-L relation; such mass-loss rates are still an order of magnitude less than that observed in some OH/IR stars. Uncertainties in molecular opacities can significantly affect the extent of hot bottom burning, and thus the luminosities attained.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/186441

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some approximation to time-dependent mixing is required to produce 7Li in a HBB calculation.

    “Someapproximation to time-dependent mixing is required to produce 7 Li in a HBB calculation because the nuclear timescale for the reactions involved in the Cameron-Fowler mechanism is similar to the convective turnover timescale”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Boothroyd, A. I., & Sackmann, I.-J.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1992-07
Volume
393
Pages
L21
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2087175167
Cited by
69
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
asymptotic giant branch, hot bottom burning, stellar evolution, molecular opacities, mixing length theory, mass loss, OH/IR stars, stellar luminosity, stellar mass

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review