Cited by 417Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

The chemical composition of carbon stars. I - Carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen in 30 cool carbon stars in the Galactic disk

Lambert, David L., Gustafsson, Bengt, Eriksson, Kjell, Hinkle, Kenneth H.·1986·The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series

Abstract

Chemical compositions of 30 Galactic carbon stars are determined from high-resolution infrared spectra and new model atmospheres. Elemental C, N, and O abundances are quite similar to those seen in planetary nebulae and are consistent with those reported for G to M giants. Carbon stars show only modest carbon enrichments: C/O is less than 1.6, and half the sample have C/O less than 1.1. The 12C/13C ratio is between 20 and 90 except for a few 13C-rich stars. When line blanketing by HCN and C2H2 is included, models predict the observed intensity of the H2 quadrupole lines. This and other evidence shows that the carbon stars are not hydrogen-deficient.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/191145

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most C-rich AGB stars have 12C/13C ratios between about 30 and 80, but a small number with ratios below 30 cannot be explained by lowering the RGB ratio.

    “Whereas most C-rich AGB stars have 12 C/ 13 C ratios between about 30 and 80, there is a small number with 12 C/ 13 C ratios below 30 (e.g., Lambert et al. 1986; Abia & Isern 1997) that cannot be explained using the method above.”
  • The C and N abundances predicted by models do not match those observed in AGB stars.

    “The C and N abundances predicted by models do not match those observed in AGB stars (e.g., Lambert et al. 1986; Abia & Isern 1997; Milam, Woolf, & Ziurys 2009).”
  • The C isotopic ratios measured in AGB stars span a large range, from very low 12C/13C ratios of ≈4 to a maximum of about 100.

    “The C isotopic ratios measured in AGB stars span a large range, from very low 12 C/ 13 C ratios of ≈ 4 to a maximum of about 100 (Lambert et al. 1986; Abia & Isern 1997).”
  • The sample by Lambert et al. (1986) has an average 12C/13C value of 58 (without J-type C stars).

    “The sample by Lambert et al. (1986) has an average value of 58 (without the J-type C stars whose origin is unknown).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lambert, D. L., Gustafsson, B., Eriksson, K., & Hinkle, K. H.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published
1986-10
Volume
62
Pages
373
ISSN
  • 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4365
OpenAlex
W2014889675
Cited by
417
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
carbon stars, chemical abundances, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, Galactic disk, cool giants, carbon enrichment, C/O ratio, 13C/12C ratio, hydrogen cyanide, C2H2, line blanketing, model atmospheres, planetary nebulae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review