The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the abundance of primordial helium
Open accessAbstract
We have used recent observations of helium-4, nitrogen and oxygen from some four dozen, low metallicity, extra-galactic HII regions to define mean $N$ versus $O$, $^4He$ versus $N$ and $^4He$ versus $O$ relations which are extrapolated to zero metallicity to determine the primordial $^4He$ mass fraction $Y_P$. The data and various subsets of the data, selected on the basis of nitrogen and oxygen, are all consistent with $Y_P = 0.232 \pm 0.003$. For the 2$\sigma$ (statistical) upper bound we find $Y_P^{2\sigma} \le 0.238$. Estimating a 2\% systematic uncertainty $(\sigma _{syst} = \pm 0.005)$ leads to a maximum upper bound to the primordial helium mass fraction: $Y_P^{MAX} = Y_P^{2\sigma} + \sigma_{syst} \le 0.243$. We compare these upper bounds to $Y_P$ with recent calculations of the predicted yield from big bang nucleosynthesis to derive upper bounds to the nucleon-to-photon ratio $\eta$ ($\eta_{10} \equiv 10^{10}\eta$) and the number of equivalent light (\lsim 10 MeV) neutrino species. For $Y_P \le 0.238$ ($0.243$), we find $\eta_{10} \le 2.5 (3.9)$ and $N_\nu \leq 2.7 (3.1)$. If indeed $Y_P \le 0.238$, then BBN predicts enhanced production of deuterium and helium-3 which may be in conflict with the primordial abundances inferred from model dependent (chemical evolution) extrapolations of solar system and interstellar observations. Better chemical evolution models and more data - especially $D$-absorption in the QSO Ly-$\alpha$ clouds - will be crucial to resolve this potential crisis for BBN. The larger upper bound, $Y_P \leq 0.243$ is completely
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Big-bang nucleosynthesis and hadronic decay of long-lived massive particles
Kawasaki, M., Kohri, K., & Moroi, T. (2005) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.083502 · Cited by 817
Primordial nucleosynthesis: theory and observations
Olive, K. A., Steigman, G., & Walker, T. P. (2000) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(00)00031-4 · Cited by 448
Self-citationThe Primordial Helium Abundance: Systematic Effects and a New Determination
Izotov, Y. I., Thuan, T. X., & Lipovetsky, V. A. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/312956 · Cited by 441
New BBN limits on physics beyond the standard model from 4He
Cyburt, R. H., Fields, B. D., Olive, K. A., & Skillman, E. (2005) · Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2005.01.005 · Cited by 405
Self-citationSignatures of relativistic neutrinos in CMB anisotropy and matter clustering
Bashinsky, S., & Seljak, U. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.083002 · Cited by 372
Metadata
- Authors
- Olive, K. A., & Steigman, G.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 97
- Pages
- 49
- ISSN
- 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4365
- OpenAlex
- W2105372899
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the abundance of primordial helium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/192134
- The paper
- Olive, K. A., & Steigman, G. (1995). On the abundance of primordial helium. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.1086/192134
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.