The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Loop Corrections in Nonlinear Cosmological Perturbation Theory
Open accessAbstract
Using a diagrammatic approach to Eulerian perturbation theory, we calculate analytically the variance and skewness of the density and velocity divergence induced by gravitational evolution from Gaussian initial conditions, including corrections beyond leading order. Except for the power spectrum, previous calculations in cosmological perturbation theory have been confined to leading order (tree level): we extend these to include loop corrections. For scale-free initial power spectra, P(k) ∼kn with -2 ≤ n ≤ 2, the one-loop variance σ2 ≡ <δ> = σ2l + 1.82σ4l, and the skewness S3 = <δ2>/δ4 = 34/7 + 9.8σ2l, where σl is the rms fluctuation of the density field to linear order. (These results depend weakly on the spectral index n, due to the nonlocality of the nonlinear solutions to the equations of motion.) Thus, loop corrections for the (unsmoothed) density field begin to dominate over tree-level contributions (and perturbation theory presumably begins to break down) when σ2l ≃ 1/2 For the divergence of the velocity field, loop dominance does not occur until σ2l ≈ 1. We also compute loop corrections to the variance, skewness, and kurtosis for several nonlinear approximation schemes, where the calculation can be easily generalized to one-point cumulants of higher order and arbitrary number of loops. We find that the Zeldovich approximation gives the best approximation to the loop corrections of exact perturbation theory, followed by the linear potential approximation (LPA) and the frozen flow approximation (FFA), in qualitative agreement with the relative behavior of tree-level results. In LPA and FFA, loop corrections are infrared divergent for spectral indices n ≤ -1; this is related to the breaking of Galilean invariance in these schemes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Theory of Critical Phenomena: An Introduction to the Renormalization Group
Binney, J. J., Dowrick, N. J., Fisher, A. J., & Newman, M. E. J. (1992) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198513940.001.0001 · Cited by 1,243
Cited by
Desjacques, V., Jeong, D., & Schmidt, F. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 · Cited by 817
Transients from initial conditions in cosmological simulations
Crocce, M., Pueblas, S., & Scoccimarro, R. (2006) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11040.x · Cited by 657
Self-citationThe IR-resummed Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures
Senatore, L., & Zaldarriaga, M. (2015) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/02/013 · Cited by 260
Matsubara, T. (2008) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.083519 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Scoccimarro, R., & Frieman, J.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 105
- Pages
- 37
- ISSN
- 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4365
- OpenAlex
- W1509369468
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 1
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Loop Corrections in Nonlinear Cosmological Perturbation Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/192306
- The paper
- Scoccimarro, R., & Frieman, J. (1996). Loop Corrections in Nonlinear Cosmological Perturbation Theory. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.1086/192306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.