Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Loop Corrections in Nonlinear Cosmological Perturbation Theory

Open access
Scoccimarro, Roman, Frieman, Joshua·1996·The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series

Abstract

Using a diagrammatic approach to Eulerian perturbation theory, we calculate analytically the variance and skewness of the density and velocity divergence induced by gravitational evolution from Gaussian initial conditions, including corrections beyond leading order. Except for the power spectrum, previous calculations in cosmological perturbation theory have been confined to leading order (tree level): we extend these to include loop corrections. For scale-free initial power spectra, P(k) ∼kn with -2 ≤ n ≤ 2, the one-loop variance σ2 ≡ <δ> = σ2l + 1.82σ4l, and the skewness S3 = <δ2>/δ4 = 34/7 + 9.8σ2l, where σl is the rms fluctuation of the density field to linear order. (These results depend weakly on the spectral index n, due to the nonlocality of the nonlinear solutions to the equations of motion.) Thus, loop corrections for the (unsmoothed) density field begin to dominate over tree-level contributions (and perturbation theory presumably begins to break down) when σ2l ≃ 1/2 For the divergence of the velocity field, loop dominance does not occur until σ2l ≈ 1. We also compute loop corrections to the variance, skewness, and kurtosis for several nonlinear approximation schemes, where the calculation can be easily generalized to one-point cumulants of higher order and arbitrary number of loops. We find that the Zeldovich approximation gives the best approximation to the loop corrections of exact perturbation theory, followed by the linear potential approximation (LPA) and the frozen flow approximation (FFA), in qualitative agreement with the relative behavior of tree-level results. In LPA and FFA, loop corrections are infrared divergent for spectral indices n ≤ -1; this is related to the breaking of Galilean invariance in these schemes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/192306

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Scoccimarro, R., & Frieman, J.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published
1996-07
Volume
105
Pages
37
ISSN
  • 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4365
OpenAlex
W1509369468
Cited by
198
References
1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Loop Corrections in Nonlinear Cosmological Perturbation Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/192306
The paper
Scoccimarro, R., & Frieman, J. (1996). Loop Corrections in Nonlinear Cosmological Perturbation Theory. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.1086/192306

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.