Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 377

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Morphologies of Distant Galaxies. II. Classifications from the Hubble Space Telescope Medium Deep Survey

Open access
Abraham, Roberto G., van den Bergh, Sidney, Glazebrook, Karl, Ellis, Richard S., Santiago, Basilio X., Surma, Peter, Griffiths, Richard E.·1996·The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series

Abstract

The morphological properties of high-redshift galaxies are investigated using a sample of 507 objects (I < 22.0 mag) from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Medium Deep Survey. Independent visual morphological classifications for each galaxy are used to quantify the statistical uncertainties in the galaxy classifications. Visual classifications are found to agree well for I < 21 mag. Fainter than I = 21 mag significant disagreements are seen in the independent visual classifications of late-type systems with T > 7, merging systems, and peculiar galaxies. The classifications of these systems are shown to be some- what subjective. Objective classifications based upon measurements of central concentration and asymmetry for the Medium Deep Survey sample are presented. These classifications are calibrated using measurements of structural parameters for an artificially redshifted sample of local objects. Morphologically segregated number counts using both sets of visual classifications and objective classifications support the conclusion that the observed galaxy counts agree with no-evolution predictions for the elliptical and spiral populations, as reported in Glazebrook et al. (1995a). A major conclusion is that the large overdensity of merging/peculiar/irregular galaxies relative to the predictions of no-evolution models (reported by Glazebrook et al. 1995a) is confirmed. However, the shape of the faint-end (I > 21.0 mag) number count relation for peculiar objects is sensitive to the large systematic uncertainties inherent in the visual classification of these objects. Despite this caveat, the frequency of objects showing clear evidence for tidal interactions (e.g., tidal tails) in the HST sample is at least 50% larger than it is among nearby galaxies, at the 2 σ level. Relatively few "chain galaxies" are seen among the sample of peculiar objects, suggesting that these systems do not form a large component of the peculiar galaxy population at I < 22 mag.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/192352

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 377

Metadata

Authors
Abraham, R. G., van den Bergh, S., Glazebrook, K., Ellis, R. S., Santiago, B. X., Surma, P., & Griffiths, R. E.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published
1996-11
Volume
107
Pages
1
ISSN
  • 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4365
OpenAlex
W1970517322
Cited by
377
References
0
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Morphologies of Distant Galaxies. II. Classifications from the Hubble Space Telescope Medium Deep Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/192352
The paper
Abraham, R. G., van den Bergh, S., Glazebrook, K., Ellis, R. S., Santiago, B. X., Surma, P., & Griffiths, R. E. (1996). The Morphologies of Distant Galaxies. II. Classifications from the Hubble Space Telescope Medium Deep Survey. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.1086/192352

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.