The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Moral Models in Anthropology
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This question is an old one for anthropologists, which famously played up in the fi erce debate between Nancy Scheper-Hughes (1995) and Roy d ' Andrade (1995) about the moral aspects of research.”
From Bruno Latour and the anthropology of the moderns (2013) · cites this paper as d'Andrade 1995
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Anthropology of Ethics and Morality
Mattingly, C., & Throop, J. (2018) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050129 · Cited by 234
Bruno Latour and the anthropology of the moderns
Berliner, D., Legrain, L., & van de Port, M. (2013) · Social Anthropology · doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12051 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- D'Andrade, R.
- Venue
- Current Anthropology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 399-408
- ISSN
- 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5382
- OpenAlex
- W2113479788
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 45.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Anthropology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
- Keywords
- moral exemplars, moral reasoning, moral psychology, cross-cultural comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
