The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Situational Effects of Advertising Repetition: The Moderating Influence of Motivation, Ability, and Opportunity to Respond
Abstract
It is argued theoretically that the attitudinal gain from advertising repetition should continue to increase rather than level off when consumers fail to generate cognitive responses to message arguments in earlier exposures. An experiment shows that repetition continues to increase brand attitudes and purchase intentions in conditions where support and counter argument production is expected to be low, but that these attitudinal gains level off under conditions in which a high level of such production is expected.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.97 · Cited by 813
Cited by
The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes
Celsi, R. L., & Olson, J. C. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209158 · Cited by 2,070
Angst, C. M., & Agarwal, R. (2009) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20650295 · Cited by 1,043
Information Processing from Advertisements: Toward an Integrative Framework
MacInnis, D. J., & Jaworski, B. J. (1989) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298905300401 · Cited by 653
The truth about the truth: a meta-analytic review of the truth effect
Dechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309352251 · Cited by 592
Can evoking nature in advertising mislead consumers? The power of ‘executional greenwashing'
Parguel, B., Benoit-Moreau, F., & Russell, C. A. (2015) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2014.996116 · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Batra, R., & Ray, M. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1986-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 432
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W1974568389
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
