The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychological Commitment and Its Effects on Post-Decision Evaluation and Preference Stability among Voters
Abstract
High psychological commitment to a vote decision produces halo effects in the subsequent evaluation of election outcomes and is associated with greater preference stability. Among low commitment voters, preferences are more unstable and subject to less cognitive mediation. Social motivation moderates the influence of social versus personal outcomes in post-decision evaluation for high but not for low commitment voters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions
Oliver, R. L. (1980) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378001700405 · Cited by 14,494
The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change.
Osgood, C. E., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1955) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0048153 · Cited by 1,700
Cited by
The Process of Customer Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Bowden, J. L.-H. (2009) · Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.2753/mtp1069-6679170105 · Cited by 1,365
Metadata
- Authors
- Crosby, L. A., & Taylor, J. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1983-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 413
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2081166514
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychological Commitment and Its Effects on Post-Decision Evaluation and Preference Stability among Voters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/208935
- The paper
- Crosby, L. A., & Taylor, J. R. (1983). Psychological Commitment and Its Effects on Post-Decision Evaluation and Preference Stability among Voters. Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/208935
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
