The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Eye-Fixation Analysis of Choice Processes for Consumer Nondurables
Abstract
The nature of the choice process for commonly purchased nondurables was examined by tracking eye fixations in a laboratory simulation of supermarket shelving. The observed process contains three stages that were interpreted as (1) orientation, (2) evaluation, and (3) verification. Orientation consisted of an overview of the product display, although some initial screening out of alternatives also occurred. The evaluation stage, the longest by far, was dominated by direct comparisons between two or three alternative products. The last stage, devoted to verification of the tentatively chosen brand-size, mainly examined alternatives with few or no previous fixations. Greater familiarity with a product category led to a choice process that was shorter and that focused on fewer alternatives, but these effects were confined to the evaluation stage. The findings are fully compatible with the general view that the choice process is constructed to adapt to the immediate purchase environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback
Joachims, T., Granka, L., Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., & Gay, G. (2005) · Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval · doi:10.1145/1076034.1076063 · Cited by 1,408
Visual attention during brand choice: The impact of time pressure and task motivation
Pieters, R., & Warlop, L. (1999) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/s0167-8116(98)00022-6 · Cited by 603
Accurately Interpreting Clickthrough Data as Implicit Feedback
Joachims, T., Granka, L., Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., & Gay, G. (2017) · ACM SIGIR Forum · doi:10.1145/3130332.3130334 · Cited by 212
Summerfield, C., & Tsetsos, K. (2012) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00070 · Cited by 167
Cue-based decision making. A new framework for understanding the uninvolved food consumer
Hamlin, R. P. (2010) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2010.04.007 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Russo, J. E., & Leclerc, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 274
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W1981676546
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Eye-Fixation Analysis of Choice Processes for Consumer Nondurables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/209397
- The paper
- Russo, J. E., & Leclerc, F. (1994). An Eye-Fixation Analysis of Choice Processes for Consumer Nondurables. Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/209397
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.