Authoritarianism as World View
Abstract
A promising alternative to the psychoanalytic conception of authoritarianism is the "breadth of perspective" approach. Several writers have argued that authoritarianism results, at least in part, from the lack of broad social perspectives. However, they have not made it sufficiently clear how breadth of perspective operates to discourage authoritarianism and how it relates to more than one or two of the several components of the authoritarianism complex. By specifically taking account of the particular world view which underlies the interdependent characteristics of authoritarianism, it is possible to explicate the relationship between breadth of perspective and authoritarianism. This world view seems impressively similar to the concept of "reification," as described explicitly or implicitly by a number of social theorists. It is maintained here that reification is induced by narrow perspectives and diminished by broadened perspectives. An "authoritarian personality" is not a prerequisite for such reification. But many of the characteristics of authoritarianism can result from this orientation toward social reality.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Education raises awareness of the subjective and particularistic character of individual beliefs.
“Education therefore raises awareness of the subjective and particularistic character of individual beliefs (Gabennesch, 1972; Roof, 1974).”
From The Effect of Education on Nationalism and Ethnic Exclusionism: An International Comparison (2003) · cites this paper as Gabennesch, 1972
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Perceived Threat and Authoritarianism
Feldman, S., & Stenner, K. (1997) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/0162-895x.00077 · Cited by 1,043 · see citing works
The Effect of Education on Nationalism and Ethnic Exclusionism: An International Comparison
Coenders, M., & Scheepers, P. (2003) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/0162-895x.00330 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gabennesch, H.
- Corresponding author
- Gabennesch, Howard
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1972-03
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 857-875
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W2037052674
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 15.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Psychoanalysis and Social Critique
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- authoritarianism, worldview, reification, authoritarian personality, societal perspective, interdependence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review