The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Integration of Fieldwork and Survey Methods
Abstract
A historical antagonism between the proponents of qualitative fieldwork and of survey research has prevented recognition of the benefits to be gained by employing both methods in the same study. Each method can be greatly strenthenedby appealing to the unique qualities of the other. Through examination of a number of cases in which the methods have been integrated, it is possible to discern important benefits is design, data collection, and analysis. In order tofully exploit the advantages of integration, however, adjustments in traditionalprocedures will have to be made, thereby yielding a new style of social research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x033007014 · Cited by 11,170
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103
Toward a definition of mixed methods research
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689806298224 · Cited by 6,464
Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737011003255 · Cited by 5,687
Burawoy, M. (1998) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/0735-2751.00040 · Cited by 2,916
Morgan, D. L. (1998) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973239800800307 · Cited by 1,374
How to Conduct a Mixed Methods Study: Recent Trends in a Rapidly Growing Literature
Small, M. L. (2011) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102657 · Cited by 829
The central role of human resource management in the search for sustainable organizations
Jabbour, C. J. C., & Santos, F. C. A. (2008) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585190802479389 · Cited by 649
Data Analysis Strategies for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs
Caracelli, V. J., & Greene, J. C. (1993) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737015002195 · Cited by 627
Creswell, J. W. (1999) · Handbook of Educational Policy · doi:10.1016/b978-012174698-8/50045-x · Cited by 565
Markus, M. L. (1994) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/196734.196738 · Cited by 310
Jabbour, C. J. C., Santos, F. C. A., Fonseca, S. A., & Nagano, M. S. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.018 · Cited by 172
A qualitative analysis of the process, mediating variables and impact of traumatic childbirth
Allen, S. (1998) · Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology · doi:10.1080/02646839808404563 · Cited by 115
Mixing methods as a process towards indigenous methodologies
Botha, L. (2011) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2010.516644 · Cited by 102
Management and virtual decentralised networks: The Linux project
Dafermos, G. N. (2001) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v6i11.898 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Sieber, S. D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1973-05
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1335-1359
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W1972016659
- Cited by
- 615
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
