The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Human Values and the Market: The Case of Life Insurance and Death in 19th-Century America
Abstract
Qualitative analysis of historical data concerning the diffusion of life insurance in the United States during the 19th century helps to explore the problem of establishing monetary equivalents for those aspects of the social order, such as death, that are culturally defined as above financial relationships. The financial evaluation of a man's life introduced by the life insurance industry was initially rejected by many as a profanation which transformed the sacred event of death into a vulgar commodity. By the latter part of the 19th century, the economic definition of the value of death became finally more acceptable, legitimating the life insurance enterprise. However, the monetary evaluation of death did not desacralize it; life insurance emerged as a new form of ritual with which to face death.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Algorithmic Control in Platform Food Delivery Work
Griesbach, K., Reich, A., Elliott-Negri, L., & Milkman, R. (2019) · Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/2378023119870041 · Cited by 443
Conservative Protestants and Wealth: How Religion Perpetuates Asset Poverty
Keister, L. A. (2008) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/525506 · Cited by 198
Product Categories as Judgment Devices: The Moral Awakening of the Investment Industry
Arjaliès, D.-L., & Durand, R. (2019) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2018.1267 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Zelizer, V. A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1978-11
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 591-610
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W1993962922
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.