The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic Analysis of Event Histories
Abstract
There is wide interest among sociologists in the study of change but little reflection of this interest in sociological research methods. In this paper we consider the advantages of and procedures of dynamic analysis of event-history data-data givin the number, timing, and sequence of changes in a categorical dependent variable. We argue for grounding this analysis in a continuous-time stochastic model. This permits the data to be fully utilized; it also allows a unified treatment of the various outcomes analyzed in the many approaches that use only part of the information contained in such data. We focus on the familiar continuos-time Markov model, summarize its properties, report its implications for various outcomes, describe extensions to deal with population heterogeneity and time dependence, and outline a maximum-likelihood procedure for estimating the extended model from event-history data. The discussion in illustrated with an empirical analysis of the effects of an income-maintenance experiment on change in marital status. We conclude by contrasting event-history analysis with cross-sectional analysis, event-count analysis, and panel analysis. We find that event-history analysis has substantial advantages over the other approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Theory of Stochastic Processes
Cox, D. R., Miller, H. D., Weiss, G., & Shuler, K. (1966) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3047872 · Cited by 3,324
Cited by
Discrete-Time Methods for the Analysis of Event Histories
Allison, P. D. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270718 · Cited by 2,096
The liability of newness: age dependence in organizational death rates
Freeman, J., Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094928 · Cited by 1,700
Self-citationAmemiya, T. (1984) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(84)90074-5 · Cited by 1,520
An Introduction to Sample Selection Bias in Sociological Data
Berk, R. A. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095230 · Cited by 1,213
Using Narrative in Social Research
Elliott, J. (2005) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9780857020246 · Cited by 1,113
Metadata
- Authors
- Tuma, N. B., Hannan, M. T., & Groeneveld, L. P.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1979-01
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 820-854
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W1983779505
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic Analysis of Event Histories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/226863
- The paper
- Tuma, N. B., Hannan, M. T., & Groeneveld, L. P. (1979). Dynamic Analysis of Event Histories. American Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1086/226863
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.