The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Minority Status, Ethnic Culture, and Distress: A Comparison of Blacks, Whites, Mexicans, and Mexican Americans
Abstract
We examine the psychological well-being of blacks, whites, Mexicans, and Mexican Americans. There are two perspectives on the differences in distress among these groups: the minority-status perspective and the ethnic-culture perspective. Within the context of the minority status perspective, two hypotheses are tested: (1) Minority status per se is distressing. (2) Minority status is distressing only because it is associated with low social class. Within the ethnic-culture perspective, a number of additional hypotheses are tested: (3) Mexican heritage is associated with lower distress (4) because the impact of social stressors is not as great among persons of Mexican heritage as among others. However, (5) Mexicans living in the United States but not raised here suffer distress due to cultural alienation. Within the minority-status perspective, hypothesis 1 is rejected. Hypothesis 2 is supported with the qualification that, although both the black and Mexican minorities are distressed by low income, only blacks are distressed by low education. This finding indicates the usefulness of the ethnic-culture perspective. Since Mexicans have lower distress than others, hypothesis 3 is supported. Hypothesis 4 is accepted because Mexicans are not distressed by low education or by divorce and separation. Hypothesis 5 is rejected. The results suggest that future research should concentrate on the effects of specific cultural arrangements rather than on general minority-status effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Effect of Social Support in Moderating the Health Consequences of Unemployment
Gore, S. (1978) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136531 · Cited by 762
Cited by
Minority Stress and Mental Health in Gay Men
Meyer, I. H. (1995) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2137286 · Cited by 4,264
The impact of culture on the cognitive structure of illness
Angel, R., & Thoits, P. (1987) · Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/bf00048494 · Cited by 342
Minority stress, masculinity, and social norms predicting gay men's health risk behaviors.
Hamilton, C. J., & Mahalik, J. R. (2009) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0014440 · Cited by 291
Disparities in outcomes of patients admitted with diabetic foot infections.
Tan, T.-W., Shih, C.-D., Concha-Moore, K. C., Diri, M. M., Hu, B., Marrero, D., Zhou, W., & Armstrong, D. G. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0211481 · Cited by 111
Stress and illness in low-income women: the roles of hardiness, John Henryism, and Race
Williams, D., & Lawler, K. A. (2001) · Women & Health · doi:10.1300/j013v32n04_04 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1980-11
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 479-495
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W1980922160
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Minority Status, Ethnic Culture, and Distress: A Comparison of Blacks, Whites, Mexicans, and Mexican Americans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/227277
- The paper
- Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1980). Minority Status, Ethnic Culture, and Distress: A Comparison of Blacks, Whites, Mexicans, and Mexican Americans. American Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1086/227277
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.