The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Felicity's Condition
Abstract
In this paper an effort is made to review the relevance and limitations of a scattering of near-recent work in sociolinguistics, pragmatics, and conversational analysis with respect to a central issue in the sociological study of social interaction: the taken-for-granted and the inferences made therefrom. The hope is that the line between microsociological studies and sociolinguistics can be shown to be arbitrary, requiring those on each side of the division to address the concerns of those on the other side.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
Cited by
Repair After Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation
Schegloff, E. A. (1992) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/229903 · Cited by 1,820
Symbolic Power and Organizational Culture
Hallett, T. (2003) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/1467-9558.00181 · Cited by 249
Streetwise Science: Toward a Theory of the Code of the Classroom
Smardon, R. (2004) · Mind, Culture, and Activity · doi:10.1207/s15327884mca1103_3 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Goffman, E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1983-07
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-53
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W2079939942
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 31.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
