The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Theory of the Critical Mass. I. Interdependence, Group Heterogeneity, and the Production of Collective Action
Abstract
Collective action usually depends on a "critical mass" that behaves differently from typical group members. Sometimes the critical mass provides some level of the good for others who do nothing, while at other times the critical mass pays the start-up costs and induces widespread collective action. Formal analysis supplemented by simulations shows that the first scenario is most likely when the production function relating inputs of resource contributions to outputs of a collective good is decelerating (characterized by diminishing marginal returns), whereas the second scenario is most likely when the production function is accelerating (characterized by increasing marginal returns). Decelerating production functions yield either surpluses of contributors or order effects in which contributions are maximized if the least interested contribute first, thus generating strategic gaming and competition among potential contributors. The start-up costs in accelerating production functions create severe feasibility problems for collective action, and contractual or conventional resolutions to collective dilemmas are most appropriate when the production function is accelerating.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure
Samuelson, P. A. (1954) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1925895 · Cited by 7,458
Ten years of research on group size and helping.
Latané, B., & Nida, S. (1981) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.89.2.308 · Cited by 749
Cited by
Mobilization and Participation: Social-Psychological Expansisons of Resource Mobilization Theory
Klandermans, B. (1984) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095417 · Cited by 1,270
Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action
(2003) · doi:10.1093/0199251789.001.0001 · Cited by 1,078
Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice
Markus, M. L. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.4.502 · Cited by 1,073
Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations
Valente, T. W. (1996) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(95)00256-1 · Cited by 1,041
The Dynamics of Informational Cascades: The Monday Demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989–91
Lohmann, S. (1994) · World Politics · doi:10.2307/2950679 · Cited by 1,035
Metadata
- Authors
- Oliver, P., Marwell, G., & Teixeira, R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1985-11
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 522-556
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W2075998830
- Cited by
- 968
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 25.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Theory of the Critical Mass. I. Interdependence, Group Heterogeneity, and the Production of Collective Action. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/228313
- The paper
- Oliver, P., Marwell, G., & Teixeira, R. (1985). A Theory of the Critical Mass. I. Interdependence, Group Heterogeneity, and the Production of Collective Action. American Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1086/228313
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.