The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Social Meaning of Money: "Special Monies"
Abstract
Classic interpretations of the development of the modern world portray money as a key instrument in the rationalization of social life. Money is reductively defined as the ultimate objectifier, homogenizing all qualitative distrinctions into an abstract quantity. This paper shows the limits of such a purely utilitarian conception of "market money." A model of "special monies" is proposed to examine the extraeconomic, social basis of modern money. The article argues that, while money does indeed transform items, values, and sentiments into numerical cash equivalents, money itself is shaped in the process. Culture and social structure mark the quality of money by institutionalizing controls, restrictions, and districtions in the sources, uses, modes of allocation, and even the quantity of money. The changing social meaning and structure of domestic money, specifically married women's money in the United States, 1870-1930, are examined as an empirical case study of a special money.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Rather, we use Simmel's theory to argue that whenever a mutual exchange of sacrifices is involved in practices of economic exchange, these practices are drawn toward the monetary economy, which itself is also diverse and imperfect as scholars such as Zelizer (1989) have shown.”
From The illusion of the digital commons: 'False consciousness' in online alternative economies (2017) · cites this paper as Zelizer (1989)
Citations
Cites
Parsons, T. (1963) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/267148 · Cited by 434
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The illusion of the digital commons: 'False consciousness' in online alternative economies
Ossewaarde, M., & Reijers, W. (2017) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508417713217 · Cited by 54
A local money to stabilize capitalism: the underestimated case of the WIR
Vallet, G. (2016) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085147.2016.1224146 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Zelizer, V. A.
- Corresponding author
- Zelizer, Viviana A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 342-377
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W1976626507
- Cited by
- 809
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 14.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
- Keywords
- money, social meaning of money, money and culture, rationalization, monetary history
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Social Meaning of Money: "Special Monies". https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/229272
- The paper
- Zelizer, V. A. (1989). The Social Meaning of Money: "Special Monies". American Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1086/229272