The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intraindustry Specialization and the Gains from Trade
Abstract
Several recent empirical studies of trade suggest that interindustry specialization and trade, which reflect the conventional forces of comparative advantage, are also accompanied by intraindustry specialization, which reflects scale economies and consumers' taste for a diversity of products. This paper develops a simple model which illustrates this argument. Two main results are developed. First, the nature of trade depends on how similar countries are in their factor endowments. As countries become more similar, the trade between them will increasingly become intraindustry in character. Second, the effects of opening trade depend on its type. If intraindustry trade is sufficiently dominant, the advantages of extending the market will outweigh the distributional effects, and the owners of scarce as well as of abundant factors will be better off.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms
BERNARD, A. B., REDDING, S. J., & SCHOTT, P. K. (2007) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-937x.2007.00413.x · Cited by 958
Metadata
- Authors
- Krugman, P. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Political Economy
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1981-10
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 959-973
- ISSN
- 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-534X
- OpenAlex
- W2044295958
- Cited by
- 802
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraindustry Specialization and the Gains from Trade. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/261015
- The paper
- Krugman, P. R. (1981). Intraindustry Specialization and the Gains from Trade. Journal of Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1086/261015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.