Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Measurement of Monopoly Behavior: An Application to the Cigarette Industry

Sumner, Daniel A.·1981·Journal of Political Economy

Abstract

A simple scheme is proposed to measure monopoly pricing behavior. The coefficient of the tax rate term in a price equation identifies the ratio of price to marginal cost. No direct measurement of costs is required, so a major problem for other empirical studies of monopoly is avoided. Empirical results for cross-section time-series data support rejection of atomistic competition but also provide evidence against the operation of an effective cartel in the cigarette industry. The model represents an alternative interpretation of related results in a recent paper by Barzel. Application of the methodology to other markets is feasible.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/261017

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Sumner, D. A.
Venue
Journal of Political Economy
Published
1981-10
Volume
89
Issue
5
Pages
1010-1019
ISSN
  • 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-534X
OpenAlex
W1987182230
Cited by
162
References
0
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement of Monopoly Behavior: An Application to the Cigarette Industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/261017
The paper
Sumner, D. A. (1981). Measurement of Monopoly Behavior: An Application to the Cigarette Industry. Journal of Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1086/261017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.