The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sticky Prices in the United States
Open accessAbstract
It has often been argued that prices are sticky in the United States. However, the empirical papers that have claimed to support this view have not reflected any formal behavioral theory. This paper presents a theory that justifies price stickiness, namely, that firms, fearing to upset their customers, attribute a cost to price changes. The rational expectations equilibrium of an economy with many such firms is presented, estimated with postwar U.S. data, and tested against alternative hypotheses. The results largely support the model. Furthermore, the hypothesis that prices are not sticky is rejected by U.S. data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An Estimated DSGE Model for Monetary Policy Analysis in Low-Income Countries
Peiris, S., & Saxegaard, M. (2007) · IMF Working Papers · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1078787 · Cited by 43
Financial Development and the Effectiveness of Monetary Policy Channels in Nigeria: A DSGE Approach
Apanisile, O. T., & Osinubi, T. T. (2020) · Journal of African Business · doi:10.1080/15228916.2019.1625021 · Cited by 17
Enisan, A. A., & Tolulope, A. O. (2019) · Global Business Review · doi:10.1177/0972150918825194 · Cited by 8
Akinlo, A. E., & Apanisile, O. T. (2021) · Preprint (Research Square) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-317014/v1 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Rotemberg, J. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Political Economy
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1982-12
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1187-1211
- ISSN
- 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-534X
- OpenAlex
- W2142741054
- Cited by
- 1,899
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.