The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Wasteful Commuting Again
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One of the most glaring issues with travel demand modeling and the gravity model is that it is done at a relatively aggregate level.”
From Key Enhancements to the WFRC/MAG Four-Step Travel Demand Model (2019) · cites this paper as Hamilton (1989)
In the citing paper
“Varying sizes of TAZs could lead to differing likelihoods that trips will be intrazonal (Hamilton, 1989; Moeckel and Donnely, 2015; Okrah, 2016).”
From Key Enhancements to the WFRC/MAG Four-Step Travel Demand Model (2019) · cites this paper as Hamilton, 1989
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Electrical Motor Drivelines in Commercial All-Electric Vehicles: A Review
de Santiago, J., Bernhoff, H., Ekergård, B., Eriksson, S., Ferhatovic, S., Waters, R., & Leijon, M. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2011.2177873 · Cited by 669
Key Enhancements to the WFRC/MAG Four-Step Travel Demand Model
University of Utah, Ewing, R., Sabouri, S., University of Utah, Park, K., University of Utah, Lyons, T., University of Utah, Tian, G., & University of Utah (2019) · doi:10.15760/trec.246 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamilton, B. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Political Economy
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1989-12
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1497-1504
- ISSN
- 0022-3808
- 1537-534X
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
