The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Problem of Environment and Selection
Abstract
Situations involving an interaction between genotype and environment may be treated by the methods of genetic correlation, if only two different environments are considered. Formulation of the genotype-environment interaction in terms of a genetic correlation leads easily to a solution of problems connected with selection. In this way a precise answer can be given to the question whether it is better to carry out selection in the environment in which the improved breed is required eventually to live, or in some other environment more favorable to the expression of the desired character. Performance in the two environments is regarded as two different characters which are genetically correlated. Selection for one character will then bring about a correlated response of the other character. The magnitude of this correlated response may then be compared with that of the direct response to selection for the desired character itself. The ratio of the correlated to the direct response may be expressed in a simple formula involving the square roots of the two heritabilities and the genetic correlation. It is possible for the correlated response to be greater than the direct response, but it seems probable that this will seldom happen. The expectation of a great increase of heritability would be the only justification for favoring selection in an environment other than the one in which the improved breed is required to live.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Smith, A., Cullis, B., & Thompson, R. (2001) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.01138.x · Cited by 566
A population genetic signal of polygenic adaptation
Berg, J. J., & Coop, G. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004412 · Cited by 487
Theory and practice in quantitative genetics
Posthuma, D., Beem, A. L., de Geus, E. J. C., van Baal, G. C. M., von Hjelmborg, J. B., Iachine, I., & Boomsma, D. I. (2003) · Twin Research · doi:10.1375/136905203770326367 · Cited by 416
Cooper, M., & DeLacy, I. H. (1994) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01240919 · Cited by 349
Bolnick, D. I., Barrett, R. D. H., Oke, K. B., Rennison, D. J., & Stuart, Y. E. (2018) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062240 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Falconer, D. S.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1952-09
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 830
- Pages
- 293-298
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2002085685
- Cited by
- 979
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Problem of Environment and Selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/281736
- The paper
- Falconer, D. S. (1952). The Problem of Environment and Selection. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/281736
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.