The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the Relative Abundance of Species
Abstract
1. A distinction is made between opportunistic and equilibrium species. 2. There is little ecological interest in the relative abundances of opportunistic species, but such species abundances should frequently have a log-normal distribution. 3. The relative abundances of equilibrium species are of considerable ecological interest and frequently can be deduced from the assumption that increase in one species population results in a roughly equal decrease in the populations of other species. To make the formulae well-defined it is necessary to assume that the census-taker has sampled a small area and thus achieved a certain sort of randomness. 4. For bird populations, at least, discrepancies between observations and predictions are negligible except when the censused area is compounded from different habitats. The discrepancy is then partly due to the fact that common species in one habitat are more likely to be present in adjacent habitats than are rate ones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biodiversity, Stability, and Productivity in Competitive Communities
Lehman, C. L., & Tilman, D. (2000) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/303402 · Cited by 913
Longrich, N. R., Scriberas, J., & Wills, M. A. (2016) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/jeb.12882 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- MacArthur, R.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1960-01
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 874
- Pages
- 25-36
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2011940648
- Cited by
- 606
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Relative Abundance of Species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/282106
- The paper
- MacArthur, R. (1960). On the Relative Abundance of Species. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/282106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.