The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On Mating Systems and Sexual Selection
Abstract
Certain aspects of the relationships of mating systems, sexual selection, sex ratios, rates of maturation in males, and behavior in grackles and other icterids have been considered. In the promiscuous grackles of the genus Quiscalus, the nestling sex ratio is balanced but differential mortality in the sexes following the nestling stage produces a marked imbalance in the tertiary sex ratio in favor of females. Further imbalance in the sex ratio at the breeding colonies results from the failure of first-year males to breed. Imbalances in the tertiary sex ratio of the population and in the sex ratio at breeding colonies are viewed as consequences of the promiscuous mating system rather than as causal factors promoting promiscuity. An explanation for the failure of first-year males of polygynous and promiscuous species to participate in the breeding effort of the population is sought in terms of individual rather than group selection. Because the probability of a young male obtaining mates in competition with older, experienced males is very low, males which postpone breeding may ultimately have greater total reproduction; and through selection first-year males have become adaptively "handicapped" physiologically and morphologically in competition with adult males for mates. The fact that sympatric hybridization is more frequent among non-monogamous species than among those having a monogamous mating system is attributed in part to the higher sex "drive" and the lower thresholds of response of males to feminine releasers, which arise through strong sexual selection in polygamous and promiscuous mating systems. It is also suggested that the heightened aggressive tendencies of non-mono gamous males place a premium on feminine characters which minimize the chances of the female eliciting aggressive responses on the part of the male at the time of mating.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ecology, Sexual Selection, and the Evolution of Mating Systems
Emlen, S. T., & Oring, L. W. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.327542 · Cited by 6,230
On the Evolution of Mating Systems in Birds and Mammals
Orians, G. H. (1969) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282628 · Cited by 1,511
Courtship Behavior in Drosophila
Spieth, H. T. (1974) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.19.010174.002125 · Cited by 490
Costs of sexual selection in natural populations of mammals
(1992) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1992.0030 · Cited by 342
Sexual selection and human life history
Geary, D. C. (2003) · Advances in Child Development and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-2407(02)80039-8 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Selander, R. K.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1965-05
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 906
- Pages
- 129-141
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2068978984
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On Mating Systems and Sexual Selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/282360
- The paper
- Selander, R. K. (1965). On Mating Systems and Sexual Selection. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/282360
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.