Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 758

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sympatric Speciation

Smith, J. Maynard·1966·The American Naturalist

Abstract

It is shown that in a heterogeneous environment divided into two "niches," a stable polymorphism can exist between two alleles each conferring a selective advantage in one of the niches, even if adults form a single random-mating population, provided: (1) the population size is separately regulated in the two niches, and (2) the selective advantages are large. The conditions to be satisfied are given; it is difficult to say how often they will be satisfied. A stable polymorphism is favored if females tend to lay eggs in the niche in which they were themselves raised. Four genetic mechanisms--habitat selection, pleiotropic genes, modifying genes, and assortative mating genes--which could cause mating isolation are considered. It is concluded that stable polymorphism could be the first stage in sympatric speciation. The relevance of these mechanisms in allopatric speciation is also discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/282457

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 758

Metadata

Authors
Smith, J. M.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1966-11
Volume
100
Issue
916
Pages
637-650
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W4251959437
Cited by
758
References
0
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sympatric Speciation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/282457
The paper
Smith, J. M. (1966). Sympatric Speciation. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/282457

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.