Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 858

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Net Primary Productivity of Terrestrial Communities: Prediction from Climatological Data

Rosenzweig, Michael L.·1968·The American Naturalist

Abstract

Actual evapotranspiration (AE) is shown to be a highly significant predictor of the net annual above-ground productivity in mature terrestrial plant communities. Communities included ranged from deserts and tundra to tropical forests. It is hypothesized that the relationship of AE to productivity is due to the fact that AE measures the simultaneous availability of water and solar energy, the most important rate-limiting resources in photosynthesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/282523

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 858

Metadata

Authors
Rosenzweig, M. L.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1968-01
Volume
102
Issue
923
Pages
67-74
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2076333297
Cited by
858
References
0
FWCI
6.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Net Primary Productivity of Terrestrial Communities: Prediction from Climatological Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/282523
The paper
Rosenzweig, M. L. (1968). Net Primary Productivity of Terrestrial Communities: Prediction from Climatological Data. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/282523

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.