The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Evolution of Mating Systems in Birds and Mammals
Abstract
Predictions from a theory assuming mate selection on the part of females, which maximizes reproductive success of individuals, are found to accord closely, though not completely, with known mating patterns. These predictions are that (1) polyandry should be rare, (2) polygyny should be more common among mammals than among birds, (3) polygyny should be more prevalent among precocial than among altricial birds, (4) conditions for polygyny should be met in marshes more regularly than among terrestrial environments, (5) polygyny should be more prevalent among species of early successional habitats, (6) polygyny should be more prevalent among species in which feeding areas are widespread but nesting sites are restricted, and (7) polygyny should evolve more readily among species in which clutch size is strongly influenced by factors other than the ability of the adults to provide food for the young. Most cases of polygyny in birds, a group in which monogamy is the most common mating pattern, can be explained on the basis of the model, and those cases not apparently fitting into the predictions are clearly indicated. Thus, there is no need at present to invoke more complicated and restrictive mechanisms to explain the mating patterns known to exist.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Adult attachments between mating partners are relatively rare in mammals, occurring in only 3-5% of mammalian species (Orians 1969; Kleiman 1977).”
From The behavioral, anatomical and pharmacological parallels between social attachment, love and addiction (2012) · cites this paper as Orians 1969
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
The descent of man and selection in relation to sex
チャールス, ダ., & 茂穂, 田. (1907) · Tokyo Jinrui Gakkai zasshi · doi:10.1537/ase1887.22.495 · Cited by 10,909
Ecological Adaptations for Breeding in Birds
Keast, A., & Lack, D. L. (1970) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/2874 · Cited by 3,769
The natural regulation of animal numbers
(1972) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/0047-2484(72)90031-0 · Cited by 3,001
Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behaviour
(1962) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.1962.tb08690.x · Cited by 2,058
A GENERAL THEORY OF CLUTCH SIZE
Cody, M. L. (1966) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1966.tb03353.x · Cited by 1,135
DO TROPICAL BIRDS REAR AS MANY YOUNG AS THEY CAN NOURISH ?
Skutch, A. F. (1949) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.1949.tb02293.x · Cited by 788
The Influence of Habitats on Mating Systems of North American Passerine Birds
Verner, J., & Willson, M. F. (1966) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1935753 · Cited by 472
Smith, J. M. (1958) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 424
EVOLUTION OF POLYGAMY IN THE LONG-BILLED MARSH WREN
Verner, J. (1964) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1964.tb01597.x · Cited by 328
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,001 of 1,001
Metadata
- Authors
- Orians, G. H.
- Corresponding author
- Orians, Gordon H.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1969-11
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 934
- Pages
- 589-603
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2063037305
- Cited by
- 1,511
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 47
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Naturalist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- mating systems, polygyny, polyandry, female mate choice, monogamy, birds, mammals, clutch size, reproductive success
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review