Cited by 1,660Animal Behavior and ReproductionEvolution and Genetic DynamicsEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Life Historical Consequences of Natural Selection

Gadgil, Madhav, Bossert, William H.·1970·The American Naturalist

Abstract

The tremendous variation in the life-history patterns of organisms is best explained as adaptive.any organism has a limited amount of resources at its disposal, and these have to be partitioned between reproductive and nonreproductive activities. A larger share of resources to reproductive activities, that is, a higher reproductive effort at any age, leads to a better reproductive performance at that age; this may be considered a as profit function. This reproductive effort also leads to a reduction in survival and growth and consequent diminution of the reproductive contribution of the succeeding stages in the life history; this may be considered as a cost function. Natural selection would tend to an adjustment of the reproductive effort at every age such that the overall fitness of the life history would be maximized. A model of life history processes has been developed on the basis of these considerations. It leads to the following predictions: 1. If the form of the profit function is convex, or that of the cost function concave, the optimal strategy may be to breed repeatedly. Otherwise, the optimal strategy is to breed only once in a suicidal effort like a salmon (big-bang reproduction). 2. The value of reproductive effort continuously increases with age in the case of repeated reproducers. 3. If all the stages in the life history following a certain age are adversely affected, the age of reproduction will tend to be lowered in the case of big-bang reproducers, and the r…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/282637

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Life History Theory proposes that various biological processes related to growth, health, activity and reproduction compete for finite energy resources, with different priorities depending on the phase in the life cycle and other circumstances.

    “Life History Theory proposes that various biological processes related to growth, health, activity and reproduction compete for finite energy resources, with different priorities depending on the phase in the life cycle and other circumstances.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 17 · Cited by 1,660

Authors
Gadgil, M., & Bossert, W. H.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1970-01
Volume
104
Issue
935
Pages
1-24
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2047752581
Cited by
1,660
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 35
FWCI
42.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The American Naturalist (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
life history, natural selection, reproductive investment, age at reproduction, resource partitioning, survivorship, population density, resource constraints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review