The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diversity Relations of Upland Forests in the Western Great Lakes Area
Abstract
1. Regional, environmental, and temporal gradients of species diversity were examined for upland forests of the western Great Lakes area. Tree, shrub, and herb data for 353 stands were analyzed with emphasis given to community processes regulating diversity levels. 2. The relationship between commonly employed diversity indices was examined. Dominance was shown to be highly related to equitability diversity. Types of diversity other than species-based measures were suggested. 3. A great significance was attached to changes in diversity across time and space. Diversity increased across time in pioneer forests on xeric sites. In successional forests diversity increased through time but decreased in the climax stage. This pattern was interpreted in terms of the capability of terminal species to monopolize environmental requisites. A time-space-diversity model was developed and its implications discussed in relation to recent ecological hypotheses on diversity changes with succession and environmental stress. 4. Pronounced correlations between tree, shrub, and herb diversity depended on inherent structural and dynamic characteristics of forests in different regions. Shrub or herb diversity was least in climax evergreen stands of Tsuga canadensis and greatest in successional deciduous forests. 5. Interregional comparisons of tree diversity indicated that (a) forests on xeric sites were equally low in southern, northern, and boreal transition forests; (b) tree diversity in climax southern and northern forests depended on levels of stand occupancy; and (c) ecological specialization is greatest in the northern forests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity
Huston, M. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283366 · Cited by 3,390
Patterns of Neotropical Plant Species Diversity
Gentry, A. H. (1982) · Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-6968-8_1 · Cited by 914
Shifts in southern Wisconsin forest canopy and understory richness, composition, and heterogeneity
Rogers, D. A., Rooney, T. P., Olson, D., & Waller, D. M. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-1129.1 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Authors
- Auclair, A. N., & Goff, F. G.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1971-11
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 946
- Pages
- 499-528
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2037324732
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversity Relations of Upland Forests in the Western Great Lakes Area. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/282742
- The paper
- Auclair, A. N., & Goff, F. G. (1971). Diversity Relations of Upland Forests in the Western Great Lakes Area. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/282742
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.