Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 443

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sex Ratio as a Function of Size in Marine Crustacea

Wenner, Adrian M.·1972·The American Naturalist

Abstract

A deviation from the 1:1 sex ratio is apparently widespread in marine crustaceans, but the normal practice of calculating sex ratio for a population sample obscures this fact. An inspection of the field data in a number of different forms reveals that sex ratio is a function of size in all cases examined. A study of the original field data in different taxonomic categories further reveals that the male-female relationships fall into discrete patterns which have not been noticed earlier, apparently. Instead of calculating the overall sex ratio, one can calculate the different within-size-class sex ratios for each species or population. The composite set of ratios forms one of four (or perhaps more) probability curves. In this analysis of original data, it is evident that one sigmoid curve (at times two) accurately depicts the sex ratio-size class relationship in a population. Probability curves obtained thus far are clearly independent of animal groupings but are usually remarkably consistent within each species or population. Neither do these curves show much displacement with season or with variation in population structure. It might even develop that such curves will characterize the relationship between sexes in some species or populations. Although some investigators may have recognized a sex ratio deviation in the species they have studied and may have suggested an interpretation for that species, there does not seem to exist an overview of the situation. A study of the problem as a whole discloses that there are at least five conceivable interpretations for the patterns obtained. These different interpretations are discussed briefly, but it is evident that more comprehensive field and laboratory studies are necessary. Until these studies are done, it will not be possible to decide whether one interpretation will suffice for all patterns or whether a different interpretation is in order in each case.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/282774

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 443

Metadata

Authors
Wenner, A. M.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1972-05
Volume
106
Issue
949
Pages
321-350
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2025600846
Cited by
443
References
1
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sex Ratio as a Function of Size in Marine Crustacea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/282774
The paper
Wenner, A. M. (1972). Sex Ratio as a Function of Size in Marine Crustacea. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/282774

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.