Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 439

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Partitioning of Resources and the Outcome of Interspecific Competition: A Model and Some General Considerations

Stewart, Frank M., Levin, Bruce R.·1973·The American Naturalist

Abstract

In traditional models of interspecific competition, the relationship between resources and competition is unspecified; yet the biological interpretation of the theory derived from these models is most often expressed in terms of resources. Here we develop models in which the relationship between resources and competition is precisely defined. We consider two modes of resource exploitation: (1) an equable mode in which resources are continuously supplied while organisms and wastes are continuously removed and (2) a seasonal mode in which resources are presented to the populations as discrete entities which are invaded and exhausted and the cycle is repeated when a small fraction of the surviving population invades a new resource. The relationship between resources and competition is identical for both systems. The general properties of these models are examined, with particular emphasis given to the conditions of resource partitioning which allow for stable equilibria with two species coexisting. 1. under the equable mode of resource exploitation, two species can coexist only if they have at least two resources. Stable states of coexistence can occur under all three qualitatively distinct ways in which the two species can partition two resources: (1) exclusive resources for each species, (2) an exclusive resource for one species, and (3) shared resources for both species. 2. Under the seasonal mode of resource exploitation, it is possible to obtain stable states of coexistence for two species under all three of the above qualitatively distinct ways of partitioning the resources Furthermore, and most interestingly, under this mode of resource exploitation it is possible to obtain stable states of coexistence for two species competing for a single resource. The latter can occur when one species grows faster at high concentrations while the other grows faster at low concentrations of the limiting resource. 3. In considering the relative positions of the equilibria for single species and for mixed populations, we found stable equilibria where only unstable equilibria can occur in the Volterra-Gause competition models and unstable equilibria in regions where the Volterra-Gause model predicts stability. 4. Some consideration was given to the limitations of the model and to the implications of these findings for competition theory.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/282825

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 439

Metadata

Authors
Stewart, F. M., & Levin, B. R.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1973-03
Volume
107
Issue
954
Pages
171-198
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2052856054
Cited by
439
References
0
FWCI
13.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Partitioning of Resources and the Outcome of Interspecific Competition: A Model and Some General Considerations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/282825
The paper
Stewart, F. M., & Levin, B. R. (1973). Partitioning of Resources and the Outcome of Interspecific Competition: A Model and Some General Considerations. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/282825

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.