Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 237

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Spread of Sibling Larvae of Sedentary Marine Invertebrates

Strathmann, Richard·1974·The American Naturalist

Abstract

1. It is unlikely that individual selection simply for increasing distance between juveniles or between juveniles and parents would produce the patterns of reproduction and large-scale dispersal exhibited by many benthic invertebrates with pelagic larvae. However, these patterns are compatible with the hypothesis that pelagic larval phases of several weeks are the result of individual selection for spreading sibling larvae. 2. Selection for spread of siblings as a fixed feature of the life cycle depends on survival and reproduction in the benthic phase of life and in early and late larval stages varying independently from time to time and place to place. Data on benthic populations is apparently insufficient to determine whether or not such variation occurs. However, information on horizontal diffusion rates gained from dye diffusion experiments indicates the geographic scale of independent variation required by the hypothesis. 3. Rate of diffusion in the sea increases with time (or size of diffusing patch), but even with an accelerating rate of diffusion, the advantage in adding an extra day to pelagic life probably decreases as the duration of the pelagic phase increases because the added increment of spread is smaller relative to the spread already achieved. 4. Selection for spread of sibling larvae could result in multiple spawning, greater variability in vertical swimming, or variability in length of pelagic period as well as increased length of pelagic period. Selection for multiple spawning would be more intense in invertebrates with a short pelagic larval phase and should be more common in these species if selection commonly favors spread of offspring. Unfortunately, the disadvantages of increasing dispersal by any of these supplementary means cannot be assessed. Observations on large numbers of species may be required to detect predicted trends. Specialists on some groups of invertebrates may have such data but be unaware of its relation to dispersal and evolution of complex life cycles. 5. Alternative hypotheses can explain the evolution of most patterns of development and behavior discussed here. Observations on variability in survival and reproduction in the benthic phase over areas of increasing size would provide the strongest test of the hypothesis that spread of siblings is a function of long pelagic larval stages. In such studies it is particularly important to distinguish whether variability among areas results from variation in early mortality or variations in numbers of settling larvae. A minimum estimate of the short-term advantage of spreading offspring could be gained from data on the fraction of settlers surviving and age-specific fecundity, gathered over a large area for 5 or more years.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/282883

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 237

Metadata

Authors
Strathmann, R.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1974-01
Volume
108
Issue
959
Pages
29-44
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2083219124
Cited by
237
References
0
FWCI
4.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Spread of Sibling Larvae of Sedentary Marine Invertebrates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/282883
The paper
Strathmann, R. (1974). The Spread of Sibling Larvae of Sedentary Marine Invertebrates. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/282883

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.