The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Age-Specific Reproductive Tactics
Abstract
A simple graphical model for maximization of total lifetime reproductive success is developed using the demographic parameters of current fecundity and residual reproductive value. Trade-offs between present progeny and expectation of future offspring are treated in terms of costs and profits to lifetime reproductive success. Various limitations of the model and some relevant data are presented and discussed. Single-clutched species are distinguished from those that lay multiple clutches each reproductive season, because residual reproductive value in the latter group varies proportionally much more during ontogeny than in the former group. Some difficulties in measuring reproductive effort in a changing environment are pointed out.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
Metadata
- Authors
- Pianka, E. R., & Parker, W. S.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1975-07
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 968
- Pages
- 453-464
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W1999653076
- Cited by
- 715
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
