Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sexual Selection and Nuptial Feeding Behavior in Bittacus apicalis (Insecta: Mecoptera)

Thornhill, Randy·1976·The American Naturalist

Abstract

Field and laboratory studies of Bittacus apicalis reveal the probable occurrence and importance of intersexual selection (female choice) in these insects. Females select males on the basis of the arthropod prey which the males feed to them in the prelude to copulation, and females maximize their reproductive success, as measured by increased fecundity, by choosing males with palatable prey items 19 mm2 or larger. Female preference for increased male nutritional investment was apparently the selective context for the evolution of nuptial feeding and some of the behavior surrounding nuptial feeding in B. apicalis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/283089

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Thornhill, R.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1976-07
Volume
110
Issue
974
Pages
529-548
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2056251074
Cited by
286
References
0
FWCI
9.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sexual Selection and Nuptial Feeding Behavior in Bittacus apicalis (Insecta: Mecoptera). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/283089
The paper
Thornhill, R. (1976). Sexual Selection and Nuptial Feeding Behavior in Bittacus apicalis (Insecta: Mecoptera). The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/283089

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.