CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5,754Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesBotany and Plant Ecology StudiesEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory

Grime, J. P.·1977·The American Naturalist
DOI 10.1086/283244
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

It is suggested that evolution in plants may be associated with the emergence of three primary strategies, each of which may be identified by reference to a number of characteristics including morphological features, resource allocation, phenology, and response to stress. The competitive strategy prevails in productive, relatively undisturbed vegetation, the stress-tolerant strategy is associated with continuously unproductive conditions, and the ruderal strategy is characteristic of severely disturbed but potentially productive habitats. A triangular model based upon the three strategies may be reconciled with the theory of r- and K-selection, provides an insight into the processes of vegetation succession and dominance, and appears to be capable of extension to fungi and to animals.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/283244

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 5,754

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Grime, J. P.
Corresponding author
Grime, J. P.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Published
1977-11
Volume
111
Issue
982
Pages
1169-1194
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
DOI
10.1086/283244
OpenAlex
W2055424972
Cited by
5,754
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 228 · 2025: 251 · 2024: 208 · 2023: 281 · 2022: 255 · 2021: 287 · 2020: 248 · 2019: 279 · 2018: 257 · 2017: 204 · 2016: 248 · 2015: 221 · 2014: 184 · 2013: 193 · 2012: 175
FWCI
48.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The American Naturalist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
plant life strategies, competitive strategy, ruderal strategy, r/K selection, resource allocation, phenology, stress response, vegetation succession, plant dominance, triangular model, plant evolution, fungi

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review