The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Nature of Growth Forms in the Salt Marsh Grass Spartina alterniflora
Abstract
Increases in nutrient supply convert swards of the short form of Spartina alterniflora into plants tending to resemble the tall form, in biomass/m2 and in general morphology. Competition for light is probably responsible for the vertically elongate, widely dispersed growth habit of tall form. Provision of added nutrients led to larger δ13C values, probably by the incorporation of heavier carbon from the internal air spaces of S. alterniflora during high tide, when exchange of gases with the atmosphere is prevented. The amount of interstitial water replenished at each tide is greater in areas supporting tall-form vegetation than where short form grows. There are also greater densities of mussels near creek banks, and their feeding and defecation lead to larger accumulations of particulate matter and nutrients where tall form is found. The amount of nitrogen delivered by algal nitrogen fixation does not differ greatly under the two forms. Seedling establishment usually produces tall-form plants, and a higher percentage of tall-form plants than short form produce seed. However, since electrophoretic results show no genetic differences, the form of seedlings is probably principally the result of lack of competition for nutrients and is modified by other factors. The probable sequence of events is for seedlings to become established at the edge of the banks and to grow into tall plants. If sedimentation leads to elevated marsh surfaces, as it usually does, competition by the extant plants reproducing vegetatively eventually results in short plants. This succession may be reversed by an increase in nutrient supply. This pattern over time and space is probably found in a variety of other aquatic plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Laboratory Investigation of Mean Drag in a Random Array of Rigid, Emergent Cylinders
Tanino, Y., & Nepf, H. M. (2008) · Journal of Hydraulic Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2008)134:1(34 · Cited by 490
Mudd, S. M., D'Alpaos, A., & Morris, J. T. (2010) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface · doi:10.1029/2009jf001566 · Cited by 373
Mudd, S. M., Howell, S. M., & Morris, J. T. (2009) · Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science · doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2009.01.028 · Cited by 337
Interaction between flow, transport and vegetation spatial structure
Luhar, M., Rominger, J., & Nepf, H. (2008) · Environmental Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1007/s10652-008-9080-9 · Cited by 289
Prediction of velocity profiles and longitudinal dispersion in salt marsh vegetation
Lightbody, A. F., & Nepf, H. M. (2006) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.2006.51.1.0218 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Valiela, I., Teal, J. M., & Deuser, W. G.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1978-05
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 985
- Pages
- 461-470
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2058225307
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Nature of Growth Forms in the Salt Marsh Grass Spartina alterniflora. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/283290
- The paper
- Valiela, I., Teal, J. M., & Deuser, W. G. (1978). The Nature of Growth Forms in the Salt Marsh Grass Spartina alterniflora. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/283290
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.