The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Some Reproductive Factors Affecting the Selection of Self-Fertilization in Plants
Abstract
The fitnesses of two phenotypes which differ in their frequency of self-fertilization are expressed exactly in terms of various parameters, including the relative fitness of progeny from selfing, i, and the proportion of available ovules fertilized with the aid of an external agent, e. Strategic models of natural selection find stationary conditions where the two phenotypes have the same fitness. Conditions when selfing is advantageous to populations and to individuals are not usually identical. Conditions favoring self-fertilization are more stringent when selfing competes with crossing (for individual selection, i > 1/2) and less stringent when selfing occurs prior to crossing (i > e/2). When selfing is delayed until after all opportunities for crossing, it is always advantageous if the parameters vary independently. Some functional interactions between parameters, as when an increase in selfing simultaneously reduces the efficiency of external pollinating agents, result in stationary conditions with mixed self- and cross-fertilization under certain conditions. Following a change in the level of self-fertilization, certain evolutionary adjustments increase the advantage of the acquired mode of fertilization. The models demonstrate that the evolution of various levels of self-fertilization in plants can be explained by individual selection without recourse to postulates of long-term advantages to populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
THE EVOLUTION OF SELF‐FERTILIZATION AND INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN PLANTS. I. GENETIC MODELS
Lande, R., & Schemske, D. W. (1985) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb04077.x · Cited by 1,648
Takebayashi, N., & Morrell, P. L. (2001) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.2307/3558325 · Cited by 382
CORRELATED MATINGS IN THE PARTIAL SELFER MIMULUS GUTTATUS
Ritland, K. (1989) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb05182.x · Cited by 365
The Effects of a Bottleneck on Inbreeding Depression and the Genetic Load
Kirkpatrick, M., & Jarne, P. (2000) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/303312 · Cited by 271
RAPID EVOLUTION CAUSED BY POLLINATOR LOSS IN MIMULUS GUTTATUS: RAPID EVOLUTION AFTER POLLINATOR LOSS
Bodbyl Roels, S. A., & Kelly, J. K. (2011) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01326.x · Cited by 203
Metadata
- Authors
- Lloyd, D. G.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1979-01
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-79
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2054685215
- Cited by
- 824
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some Reproductive Factors Affecting the Selection of Self-Fertilization in Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/283365
- The paper
- Lloyd, D. G. (1979). Some Reproductive Factors Affecting the Selection of Self-Fertilization in Plants. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/283365
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.