Cited by 119Avian ecology and behaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionPhysiological and biochemical adaptations

Elevation and the Morphology, Flight Energetics, and Foraging Ecology of Tropical Hummingbirds

Feinsinger, Peter, Colwell, Robert K., Terborgh, John, Chaplin, Susan Budd·1979·The American Naturalist

Abstract

The power that a hummingbird must expend to hover increases with decreasing air density and therefore with increasing elevation. Equations are available for estimating this power output requirement and for computing the easily obtained parameter of wing disc loading (ratio of body weight to area of disc whose diameter is wing span), to which power output is directly related. We test four related predictions based on these equations and on empirical patterns of exploitation versus interference competition among hummingbirds. (1) Species having the same morphology over broad elevational range are expected to engage in more interference competition at high elevations. (2) The allowable extremes of power output for hovering should be relatively constant with elevation. (3) Mean wing disc loading of hummingbird assemblages should decrease with increasing elevation. (4) The mean power output among hummingbird assemblages should not vary with elevation. Tests with field data verify the last three predictions; although independent data for testing the first prediction directly are not yet available, its validity is confirmed by a clearcut corollary. These results imply a precise interrelationship between hummingbird behavior, morphology, energetics, and competition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/283408

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relatively larger wings at higher altitudes are systematically demonstrated among hummingbird species.

    “an effect systematically demonstrated among hummingbird species”

    From The physiology and biomechanics of avian flight at high altitude (2006) · cites this paper as Feinsinger et al., 1979

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feinsinger, P., Colwell, R. K., Terborgh, J., & Chaplin, S. B.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1979-04
Volume
113
Issue
4
Pages
481-497
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2072268315
Cited by
119
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The American Naturalist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
Keywords
hummingbirds, altitude, hover, flight energetics, interference competition, exploitation competition, feeding ecology, body morphology, air density, tropical birds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review