Elevation and the Morphology, Flight Energetics, and Foraging Ecology of Tropical Hummingbirds
Abstract
The power that a hummingbird must expend to hover increases with decreasing air density and therefore with increasing elevation. Equations are available for estimating this power output requirement and for computing the easily obtained parameter of wing disc loading (ratio of body weight to area of disc whose diameter is wing span), to which power output is directly related. We test four related predictions based on these equations and on empirical patterns of exploitation versus interference competition among hummingbirds. (1) Species having the same morphology over broad elevational range are expected to engage in more interference competition at high elevations. (2) The allowable extremes of power output for hovering should be relatively constant with elevation. (3) Mean wing disc loading of hummingbird assemblages should decrease with increasing elevation. (4) The mean power output among hummingbird assemblages should not vary with elevation. Tests with field data verify the last three predictions; although independent data for testing the first prediction directly are not yet available, its validity is confirmed by a clearcut corollary. These results imply a precise interrelationship between hummingbird behavior, morphology, energetics, and competition.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Relatively larger wings at higher altitudes are systematically demonstrated among hummingbird species.
“an effect systematically demonstrated among hummingbird species”
From The physiology and biomechanics of avian flight at high altitude (2006) · cites this paper as Feinsinger et al., 1979
Cites
Crop volume, nectar concentration and hummingbird energetics
Hainsworth, F. R., & Wolf, L. L. (1972) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology · doi:10.1016/0300-9629(72)90117-x · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How animals move: an integrative view
Dickinson, M. H., Farley, C. T., Full, R. J., Koehl, M. A. R., Kram, R., & Lehman, S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5463.100 · Cited by 1,633 · see citing works
The physiology and biomechanics of avian flight at high altitude
Altshuler, D. L. (2006) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icj008 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
- Authors
- Feinsinger, P., Colwell, R. K., Terborgh, J., & Chaplin, S. B.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1979-04
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 481-497
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2072268315
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Naturalist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
- Keywords
- hummingbirds, altitude, hover, flight energetics, interference competition, exploitation competition, feeding ecology, body morphology, air density, tropical birds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review