The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reverberations and Amplitude Fluctuations in the Propagation of Sound in a Forest: Implications for Animal Communication
Abstract
Effective communication requires that the receiver not only detect the presence of a signal but also discriminate significant variations in signals. Consequently, both attenuation and degradation of the structure of acoustic signals during transmission will limit the range of communication. In this study we document two primary sources of degradation of acoustic signals during propagation through natural environments, irregular amplitude fluctuations and reverberations. Amplitude fluctuations arise especially from atmospheric turbulence, while reverberations also result from scattering surfaces, such as vegetation. Both primarily mask information coded in amplitude modulation of the signal and repetitive frequency modulation, like the trills in the songs of many passerine birds. Irregular amplitude fluctuations primarily mask low frequencies of amplitude modulation in signals. Atmospheric turbulence from wind is the primary determinant of the intensity of irregular amplitude fluctuations, although amplitude fluctuations also increase with carrier frequency and range. In contrast, reverberations depend primarily on carrier frequency and range. Reverberations are least at intermediate frequencies (2-8 kHz). At lower frequencies reverberations in sound transmission near the ground often take the form of discrete echoes, probably from canopy foliage or from the change in acoustic impedance between air in the canopy and overlying air masses. At higher frequencies reverberations usually consist of a steady decay in acoustic energy. Consequently, in contrast to irregular amplitude fluctuations, reverberations primarily mask high rates of amplitude modulation and repetitive frequency modulation in acoustic signals. Intermediate frequencies (2-8 kHz) are most suitable for long-range acoustic communication, because irregular amplitude fluctuations, reverberations, and attenuation increase with carrier frequency, while reverberations and attenuation from ground interference increase at low frequencies. The great majority of animals that engage in long-range acoustic communication use this middle range of frequencies. Perhaps because of the increase in reverberations at low carrier frequencies, the songs of rufous-sided towhees show a correlation between trill rate and the minimum frequency in trills. To minimize the effects of amplitude fluctuations and reverberations on long-range acoustic communication, signals should encode information either in frequency modulation or in repetitive amplitude modulation that allow enough redundancy or signal averaging to permit recognition of signals by receivers. Because reverberations are more severe in environments with many scattering surfaces, long-range acoustic communication in forests, as opposed to open environments, should avoid rapid amplitude modulation or repetitive frequency modulation. Among North Carolina passerine birds, species that breed in forests tend to avoid rapid repetition rates at any given frequency in their long-distance songs. The directionality of both the broadcast and reception of acoustic signals will influence the effects of scattering on reverberations and attenuation of acoustic signals. In scattering environments, the optimal directionality of sound production and reception will require compromises.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecological Sources of Selection on Avian Sounds
Morton, E. S. (1975) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282971 · Cited by 1,665
Cited by
Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution
Endler, J. A. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285308 · Cited by 1,960
Adaptations for Acoustic Communication in Birds: Sound Transmission and Signal Detection
WILEY, R. H., & RICHARDS, D. G. (1982) · Acoustic Communication in Birds · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-092416-8.50014-0 · Cited by 774
Self-citationWhat is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science
Pijanowski, B. C., Farina, A., Gage, S. H., Dumyahn, S. L., & Krause, B. L. (2011) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-011-9600-8 · Cited by 730
Pieretti, N., Farina, A., & Morri, D. (2011) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.11.005 · Cited by 658
THE “ACOUSTIC ADAPTATION HYPOTHESIS”—A REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE FROM BIRDS, ANURANS AND MAMMALS
EY, E., & FISCHER, J. (2009) · Bioacoustics · doi:10.1080/09524622.2009.9753613 · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Richards, D. G., & Wiley, R. H.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1980-03
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 381-399
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2095261004
- Cited by
- 541
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reverberations and Amplitude Fluctuations in the Propagation of Sound in a Forest: Implications for Animal Communication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/283568
- The paper
- Richards, D. G., & Wiley, R. H. (1980). Reverberations and Amplitude Fluctuations in the Propagation of Sound in a Forest: Implications for Animal Communication. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/283568
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.