The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Resources: A Graphical-Mechanistic Approach to Competition and Predation
Abstract
The growth response of a population to the resources in a particular environment is used to classify pairs of resources as being either (1) essential, (2) hemi-essential, (3) complementary, (4) perfectly substitutable, (5) antagonistic, or (6) switching. Although nutrition is one important factor determining resource type, the growth response of a population to resources also depends on the interaction between a species' foraging methods and the spatial distribution of the resources. For example, two resources which are nutritionally perfectly substitutable may be operationally switching, antagonistic, or complementary because of spatial heterogeneity. A graphical, equilibrium theory of resource competition allows prediction of the outcome of interactions between several consumers for the various classes of resources. The technique requires information on (1) resource type (growth isoclines), (2) resource preference, (3) resource supply processes, and (4) mortality rates for all species. For all resource types, the major criterion for stable coexistence is that each species consume relatively more of the one resource which more limits its own growth rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Experimental Studies on the Struggle for Existence
Gause, G. F. (1932) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.9.4.389 · Cited by 401
Cited by
Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits
MCGILL, B., ENQUIST, B., WEIHER, E., & WESTOBY, M. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.002 · Cited by 4,631
THE ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF CHANGES IN BIODIVERSITY: A SEARCH FOR GENERAL PRINCIPLES101
Tilman, D. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1455:tecoci]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,746
Self-citationTilman, D. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.11.5995 · Cited by 1,406
Self-citationPhytoplankton Community Ecology: The Role of Limiting Nutrients
Tilman, D., Kilham, S. S., & Kilham, P. (1982) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.13.110182.002025 · Cited by 1,085
Self-citationBiodiversity, Stability, and Productivity in Competitive Communities
Lehman, C. L., & Tilman, D. (2000) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/303402 · Cited by 913
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tilman, D.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1980-09
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 362-393
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2061666069
- Cited by
- 740
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resources: A Graphical-Mechanistic Approach to Competition and Predation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/283633
- The paper
- Tilman, D. (1980). Resources: A Graphical-Mechanistic Approach to Competition and Predation. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/283633
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.