The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Temporary Weight Decrease in Breeding Birds May Result in More Fledged Young
Abstract
The lowered weight in adult birds rearing young should result in energy savings during locomotion. Furthermore, the parents may live partly off the energy released during weight loss. For these reasons the parents could eat a smaller proportion of the food collected themselves and give a larger proportion to the young, potentially leading to more fledged young, faster growth, and/or better condition of the young than if the parents maintained prebreeding weight. I examine this possibility theoretically and estimate the potential number of extra young for various weight reductions and daily flight times in the parents. I estimate energy savings in flight only, since this is the most power-consuming type of locomotion. Because weight reduction in an individual bird lowers not only induced drag but also body drag, the power consumption in flight may vary approximately with the 1.5 power of the weight. Energy savings in flight resulting from weight loss may readily enable some birds to rear on average 1/4-1/2 extra young, whereas the use of energy reserves in the parents may correspond to the rearing of 0.1-1 extra young. These values are additive. I suggest the new view that the temporary weight decrease in adults while rearing young may actually enhance parental inclusive fitness, i.e., it may be adaptive instead of purely detrimental. Although a weight loss is likely to lower parental survival, the potential benefits in terms of more fledged young should shift the optimal weight downward temporarily. This might dictate what proportion of the food collected should be eaten by the parent and what proportion should be given to the young.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A re-examination of the relation between standard metabolic rate and body weight in birds
Lasiewski, R. C., & Dawson, W. R. (1967) · The Condor · doi:10.2307/1366368 · Cited by 816
ANDERSSON, M., & NORBERG, R. Å. (1981) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1981.tb00752.x · Cited by 367
Self-citation
Cited by
Food As A Limit On Breeding Birds: A Life-History Perspective
Martin, T. (1987) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.18.1.453 · Cited by 1,510
The ecological costs of avian fat storage
Witter, M. S., & Cuthill, I. C. (1993) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1993.0050 · Cited by 699
Seabirds as Indicators of Marine Food Supplies
Cairns, D. K. (1988) · Biological Oceanography · doi:10.1080/01965581.1987.10749517 · Cited by 372
Brown, C. R., & Brown, M. B. (1998) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02027.x · Cited by 288
Energetics of Avian Incubation
Williams, J. B. (1996) · Avian Energetics and Nutritional Ecology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0425-8_11 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Norberg, R. A.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1981-12
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 838-850
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2071638055
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporary Weight Decrease in Breeding Birds May Result in More Fledged Young. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/283874
- The paper
- Norberg, R. A. (1981). Temporary Weight Decrease in Breeding Birds May Result in More Fledged Young. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/283874
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.